This below is regarding a liability order from 2012 which was settled directly with the council. Thus Rundles are harassing me with spam - or they still intend on pursuing me via enforcement action in pursuit of unlawful fees and levy fees for an invalid levy. Those with good eyes will note the phrase "The above debt remains outstanding despite previous applications for payment."
You will note that nowhere do they state the "above" amount. This is the fourth such letter I have had following their attempted fraud, none of which specify an actual outstanding amount. Thus Rundles are engaged in a form of passive aggression - or are simply amateurish and unprofessional in the extreme.
Rundles do this because they cannot keep their lies straight between them. There are disparities between the charges they post through the door - and the version of events they keep on their official log. This I have seen with my own eyes. It is entirely deliberate because they benefit from sowing confusion. Rundles are not honest players. They are distinctly crooked.
You probably know about this chap - all the same this is a pretty entertaining vid - unless you work for A&S Plod, Rundles or South Gloucestershire Council - oh, yes... As Yoda might say entertaining is this
ReplyDelete